Micron Document

EPSTEIN
page 5 / 907 . OCR, unverified


that Carolyn was 14 years o

5a

ipstein's residence, claimi

, and that Virginia visited the

Flight records and credible witness

this meeting occurred before

on, when Virginia brought Carolyn to

t greeted them and instructed

quoting from the trial record --

witnessed Virginia give Epstein a

g sexual intercourse. Finally, as

to paragraphs 27 and 28, I do

Ficient basis to find by a

ce that the defendant used monetary

ginia to recruit Carolyn.

defendant objects to the assertion

ld when Virginia brought her to

ng that Carolyn's recollection is

SOUTHERN DIST

RICT REPORTERS, P.C.»

(2

12) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014759



==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014759.jpg.txt ====================


==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014760.jpg.txt ====================

METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014760.jpg
----------------------------------------
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page13o0f101 13
M6SQmaxl

inconsistent and unreliable. I overrule this objection.

Carolyn testified at trial that Virginia first brought her to

Epstein's residence when she was 14 years old. I found Carolyn
to be credible and credit her testimony. I'm not persuaded by
the arguments to the contrary. Moreover, @Sean's credible

testimony corroborated Carolyn's recollection.

Paragraph 59, the defendant makes two objections.

Same objection to Carolyn being 14. For the reasons I've

stated, that's overruled. She objects to Carolyn's assertion
that she visited Epstein's residence more than a hundred times.
overrule that objection. Again, I credit Carolyn's

testimony. She testified that she went to the house "over 100
times." I reject the suggestion that this is improbable based
on Epstein's travel schedule.
Paragraphs 61 and 62 again object to Carolyn's age,
and I overrule for the same reasons.
Paragraph 64, three objections. First, the defendant
objects to Carolyn's assertion that she visited the Palm Beach
residence over a hundred times and her assertion that she was
14. For the reasons I've given, I overrule those objections.
She objects to the assertion that Carolyn stopped performing
sexualized massages in 2001 when she was 18 years old and
argues that the evidence indicates she was 17 years old. We're
going to take up the issue of this timing question with respect
to the issue of which Guidelines Manual controls. So I'll skip

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.»

(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014760



==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014760.jpg.txt ====================


==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014761.jpg.txt ====================

METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014761.jpg
----------------------------------------






~]



a

=

NO

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
M6SQmaxl

that

for now.

Paragraph 72,

because her

by a 2009 deposition

Again,

to this at trial.

Paragraph 74,

Document 779

det

testimony.

credit Carolyn'

the d

Filed 08/22/22

Page 14 of 101 14

Fendant objects to the assertion that

Epstein briefly penetrated Carolyn's vagina with his penis

trial testimony the defense claims is contradicted

overrule this objection.

testified

s testimony.

assertion as to the age

and timing. Again,

Carolyn plainly

fendant again objects to the

we'll pick up on

that issue when we discuss the appropriate guideline manual.

inclusion of


=
Hs


a

a
~]

a

a
Ke)




the perjury counts have

Paragraphs 75 and 76 the de

these paragraphs in the present

fendant objects to the

not been

presented

she contends have no bearing on the sentence

do overrule this objection.

largely unlimited as to

consider. It's free to

dropped counts of

acquittal in determining sentence.

839 F.3d 153 (2d Cir.

an indictment,

2016).

to a jury,

nce report because

and so

in this case.

A sentencing court's discretion is

the kind of information it may

consider evidence of

criminal

uncharged crimes,

activity resulting in

long as the information

I may consider

is reliable and accurate.

following reasons, I do




severed perjury charges

United States v. Bennett,

the information as

For the

conclude the informa

is reliable. The de

under oath in 2016 that

to recruit underage girls

she was not aware of

tion underlying the

fendant testified

Epstein's scheme

SOUTHERN

(212) 805-0300

STRICT REPORTERS, P.

for sexual massages and other than

DOJ-OGR-00014761


==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00014761.jpg.txt ====================


==================== DOCUMENT: root__DOJ-OGR-00014762.jpg.txt ====================

METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00014762.jpg
----------------------------------------






~]



a

=



=
Hs


a

a
~]

a

a
Ke)





Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page15o0f101 15
M6SQmaxl

Virginia, was unaware if she had interacted with anyone under

the age of 18 at Epstein's properties. She never gave Annie
Farmer a massage. She was unaware whether Epstein possessed